
BOOKS - HUMAN AND PSYCHOLOGY - Убеждение «минные поля» переговоров...

Убеждение «минные поля» переговоров
Author: Александра Козлова, Владимир Козлов
Year: 2011
Pages: 210
Format: RTF | FB2
File size: 30 MB
Language: RU

Year: 2011
Pages: 210
Format: RTF | FB2
File size: 30 MB
Language: RU

The author argues that the development of technology has led to the creation of new fields of communication, which have become the basis for understanding the world around us. This book explores the idea that the development of these fields has created a new reality that is different from the one we knew before. The book "Убеждение «минные поля» переговоров" by Александра Козлова, Владимир Козлов is a thought-provoking exploration of the impact of technology on our understanding of the world and our place within it. The author argues that the rapid pace of technological advancement has given rise to new fields of communication that are shaping our reality in ways we never before imagined. These fields, which the author refers to as "minefields represent a fundamental shift in how we perceive and interact with the world around us. At the heart of the book is the idea that technology has created a new reality that is distinct from the one we knew before. This reality is characterized by the proliferation of digital media, the internet, and other forms of communication that have transformed the way we access and process information. The author contends that these developments have created a series of minefields that must be navigated in order to fully understand the world we live in. One of the key themes of the book is the need to study and understand the process of technology evolution. The author emphasizes the importance of recognizing the role that technology plays in shaping our perceptions of reality and the need to adapt our thinking to keep pace with the rapidly changing landscape. This requires a willingness to challenge our assumptions about the nature of reality and to embrace new ways of thinking about the world. Another important theme is the need for a personal paradigm for perceiving the technological process of developing modern knowledge.
''
